Religious conservatives spent decades building a movement to change the country’s abortion laws, and suffered many disappointments and defeats in the process. And the Supreme Court has made it easier for states to pass voting restrictions.īut political change is rarely easy. The House suffers from gerrymandering (although this year’s districts don’t actually give the Republicans much of an advantage). The Senate has a built-in preference for rural, conservative states. I recognize that progressives still face obstacles in achieving their goals through Congress. Two women or men married in California, for example, would still be legally married in South Carolina even if same-sex marriages ceased to exist. But the House bill would require one state to recognize another state’s marriage. The court could still issue a decision allowing states to stop performing same-sex marriages. As a result, the courts have tended to dominate federal politics by default.īut after the court’s abortion decision in June contained language that looked like it could threaten same-sex marriage rights, House Democrats were quick to propose a marriage bill that would overrule any future court decision.
More recently, however, Congress has been too polarized and deadlocked to act on court decisions. The law was an explicit response to a Supreme Court ruling against Ledbetter.
Congress took this approach with civil rights beginning in the 1980s, including with the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, which made it easier for workers to sue for wage discrimination. When the court repeals a particular law, Congress can often pass a new law that is written differently and accomplishes many of the same goals. “You try to persuade, and when you do, the country follows you.” And that’s what you do through democratic politics, if you want it to be a democracy,” Kramer said on the Ezra Klein podcast recently. “If you want a better government, you have to take an active part in shaping it. At the federal level, Congress has more powers to overrule court decisions than many people realize. At the state level, progressives still have an opportunity to protect abortion rights as long as they can convince enough voters - as happened in Kansas this week. In any case, the founders did not envisage the court as the last resort in American politics. But under the current court, it will no longer work. This tactic worked under the liberal Supreme Court of the 1950s and 1960s, and sometimes even under the more conservative court of recent decades.
They have instead relied on courts to win victories for civil rights and other policies. Larry Kramer, a former dean of Stanford Law School, argues that many progressives have made the mistake of paying relatively little attention to this strategy in recent decades. They contain the basic tools of democratic politics: winning public opinion and winning elections. There still isn't another laptop quite like it.Some options are quite radical, like changing the size of the court or passing a law declaring that any issue is barred from Supreme Court scrutiny (both, to be fair, happened in previous centuries).
#New york times wirecutter productreview Pc#
But overall, it's a thoughtfully designed computer that treats do-it-yourselfers and PC builders like adults who can make their own decisions. The Framework Laptop does have problems, especially when it comes to battery life.
#New york times wirecutter productreview upgrade#
It's a lightly revised version of the original chassis designed around a 12th-generation Intel Core CPU rather than an 11th-gen version, and the motherboard exists as a drop-in upgrade for anyone who has already bought a Framework Laptop. I can't say what the next year or two will bring, but I can say that the second-generation Framework Laptop is still doing almost everything right. And your small, independent company needs to continue to exist so it can keep getting all that work done, year after year, for a few years. You need to address the shortcomings of your original design (or even release new revisions) without ending support for or breaking compatibility with previous versions of your design. To do that, you need to keep up with new component releases. It's easy to open and work on, the ports can be swapped out to suit your needs, and it's sturdy and well-built enough to stand up to traditional, less-upgradeable-and-repairable ultrabooks like Dell's XPS 13 or Lenovo's ThinkPad X1 Carbon.īut making "one surprisingly good laptop" isn't the same as creating a laptop ecosystem with upgradeable, interchangeable, user-serviceable parts. The original Framework Laptop we reviewed last year did a lot of things right. It's another thing to actually follow through with it.
It's one thing to say you're making a fully user-serviceable, upgradeable laptop. Further Reading Modular, DIY-friendly Framework Laptop gets updated with 12th-gen Intel CPUs
0 kommentar(er)
